Cabinet approves ฿10.5bn central fund for flood relief
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
University staff members declare support for anti-graft agency
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
University staff members declare support for anti-graft agency
13 Sept 13:28Key points summarised by AI
University staff members and officials from 38 Rajabhat universities publicly support the National Anti-Corruption Commission's (NACC) mandate for university council members to declare assets.
This support directly counters threats of mass resignation from university council members who oppose the NACC's requirement, citing privacy and safety concerns over public asset disclosure.
The supporting group emphasizes the NACC's role in ensuring good governance and transparency within university councils, while also accusing a Deputy Prime Minister of potential interference with the anti-graft agency's work.
Warnings have been issued about potential chaos in university operations, such as student graduations and curriculum approvals, if council members resign en masse due to the ongoing dispute.
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Today 16:46Key points summarised by AI
A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.