Why voting “no” has become an issue

13 Sept 19:19 Key points summarised by AI

Former Thai Raksa Chart Party members are campaigning for "no" votes to invalidate election results in specific constituencies, aiming to trigger re-runs.
Thai election law dictates that if "no" votes surpass the winning candidate's total, the election in that constituency is nullified, necessitating a re-run.
The Election Commission is probing this campaign, deeming it a potential violation of election law, which prohibits encouraging "no" votes.
Ex-TRC members assert their democratic right, hoping re-runs will provide an opportunity to re-enter the race as candidates.
Beyond the TRC's strategy, the "no" vote also serves as a significant political statement for disillusioned voters.

Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties

Today 16:46 Key points summarised by AI

A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.