Government’s latest peril over alleged incomplete oath-taking

13 Sept 06:22 Key points summarised by AI

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha faces intense scrutiny over allegations he omitted a critical phrase from his oath of allegiance, potentially invalidating his cabinet's legitimacy.
Opposition parties, Pheu Thai and Future Forward, assert that the full oath is constitutionally mandatory, highlighting the government's top legal advisor's silence on the issue.
The controversy, amplified by the advisor's past writings on strict oath adherence, raises significant questions about the cabinet's authority to perform its duties and the dissolution status of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO).

Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties

Today 16:46 Key points summarised by AI

A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.