Bai Lu meet-and-greet cancelled days after China’s safety warning
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Charter court shoots down two petitions related to PM’s incomplete oath recital
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Charter court shoots down two petitions related to PM’s incomplete oath recital
13 Sept 02:59Key points summarised by AI
Thailand's Constitutional Court unanimously dismissed two petitions challenging Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha's incomplete recital of his oath of office.
The court ruled the swearing-in ceremony was a political issue concerning the cabinet and Monarchy, asserting it was beyond its jurisdiction to examine oaths taken in the King's presence.
A university student's petition claiming rights violation was rejected as the alleged violation was not committed by a state agency or official, a requirement for court acceptance.
A former party member's petition, alleging unconstitutional swearing-in and sabotage, was dismissed due to the Prime Minister having already addressed the factual issue and a lack of evidence for subversive acts.
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Today 16:46Key points summarised by AI
A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.