Opposition claims they have not considered amending Constitution Section 1

1 Oct 01:33 Key points summarised by AI

Opposition parties unequivocally distanced themselves from Kasetsart University lecturer Mrs. Chalita Bandhywong's controversial proposal to amend Section 1 of the Constitution, which defines Thailand as a single, indivisible kingdom, asserting their bloc has never considered changes to Chapters 1 or 2.
The Internal Security Operations Command (ISOC) accused seven core opposition members and five academics of inciting public unrest during a panel discussion, with Mrs. Chalita's comment regarding Section 1 drawing significant focus.
Opposition spokesman Adisorn Piangkate defended their right to free expression, accusing ISOC of fanaticism for pressing charges and clarifying that their constitutional amendment campaign aims to address charter deficiencies, not incite unrest.
Future Forward secretary-general Piyabutr Saengkanokkul noted Maj-Gen Burin Thongprapai's history of filing numerous complaints that often fail in court, with the opposition planning to file a petition against him.

Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties

Today 16:46 Key points summarised by AI

A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.