Constitutional Court ruling on budget bill challenged

13 Sept 09:42 Key points summarised by AI

Former MP Wattana Muangsook challenges the Constitutional Court's ruling on the 3.2 trillion baht budget bill, asserting the court overstepped its authority by ordering a re-debate.
Wattana argues the Constitution does not empower the court to rule on legislative processes; an invalid reading should nullify the entire bill, not just require a re-vote.
He contends the House cannot revisit readings already passed, and the bill's enforcement period under Section 143 has lapsed, making it unenforceable.
Despite the legal challenge, the House has scheduled a re-debate for February 13th, with the Democrat party planning for its MPs to abstain to expedite the vote.

Civic groups oppose plan to shift Thai PBS, three other bodies to state budget

Yesterday 17:04 Key points summarised by AI

Civic groups, including those representing labourers and older people, submitted a protest letter demanding the Bhumjaithai Party withdraw bills to shift funding for four organizations (Thai PBS, Older Persons Fund, Thai Health Promotion Foundation, Sports Authority of Thailand) from earmarked taxes to the central government budget.
Leaders argue these organizations were established for public interest, supporting public service media, elder care, public health, and sports development, and any amendments should consider all stakeholders' views.
Over 70% of parliamentary poll respondents opposed the proposed changes, prompting civic leaders to call on the ruling party to respect the people's will and withdraw the bills.
A network of slum dwellers also opposes the funding changes, threatening a rally if the government fails to address their demands.