Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Civic groups oppose plan to shift Thai PBS, three other bodies to state budget
Trump escalates war on Twitter, social media protections
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Trump escalates war on Twitter, social media protections
23 Sept 03:33Key points summarised by AI
President Trump signed an executive order challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which grants social media companies liability protection for content posted on their platforms.
This action was a direct response to Twitter applying fact checks to two of his tweets about mail-in ballots, which Trump deemed 'editorial decisions' and political activism.
Trump argues that social media companies should lose their liability protections if they moderate content, treating them as publishers who can face lawsuits.
The executive order directs federal agencies to explore new regulations; however, technology industry groups oppose it, and legal experts express significant doubts about its enforceability without congressional action.
Critics view the move as a political tactic to rally Trump's base and influence the online narrative ahead of the 2020 election, rather than a viable policy change.
Civic groups oppose plan to shift Thai PBS, three other bodies to state budget
Today 17:04Key points summarised by AI
Civic groups, including those representing labourers and older people, submitted a protest letter demanding the Bhumjaithai Party withdraw bills to shift funding for four organizations (Thai PBS, Older Persons Fund, Thai Health Promotion Foundation, Sports Authority of Thailand) from earmarked taxes to the central government budget.
Leaders argue these organizations were established for public interest, supporting public service media, elder care, public health, and sports development, and any amendments should consider all stakeholders' views.
Over 70% of parliamentary poll respondents opposed the proposed changes, prompting civic leaders to call on the ruling party to respect the people's will and withdraw the bills.
A network of slum dwellers also opposes the funding changes, threatening a rally if the government fails to address their demands.