Will special Parliament session be a time-buying tactic?

15 Sept 16:08 Key points summarised by AI

Observers and opposition widely view the special parliamentary session as a government tactic to delay rather than genuinely resolve the ongoing political conflict and protester demands.
Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha's refusal to resign remains a central point of contention, while key demands for constitutional and monarchy reforms face strong resistance from ruling parties and the military-appointed Senate.
Parliament's history of deferring charter change votes by forming study panels has eroded public trust, leading to skepticism that this session will offer concrete solutions rather than further delaying tactics.
Significant structural obstacles, including the Senate's power and ruling parties' stance against amending chapters on the monarchy, make substantial progress on the protesters' core demands improbable.

Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties

Yesterday 16:46 Key points summarised by AI

A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.