Bai Lu meet-and-greet cancelled days after China’s safety warning
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Opposition dealt a blow as Thai parliament’s legal advisory committee rejects key draft charter amendment
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Opposition dealt a blow as Thai parliament’s legal advisory committee rejects key draft charter amendment
13 Sept 18:38Key points summarised by AI
Thai opposition parties' effort to establish a Constitution Drafting Assembly (CDA) for a new charter faced a significant setback as parliament's legal advisory committee rejected their key draft amendment.
The rejection stems from the draft's conflict with a recent Constitutional Court ruling, which mandates two national referenda before and after parliamentary approval for any new charter.
This ruling prevents the specific draft, aimed at amending Section 256 to enable a CDA, from being placed on the parliamentary agenda for deliberation.
Despite this particular setback, the opposition continues its broader 'dual approach' strategy, having submitted multiple other draft charter amendments.
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Today 16:46Key points summarised by AI
A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.