Bai Lu meet-and-greet cancelled days after China’s safety warning
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Charter Court says it rejected protesters’ plea for further enquiry as probe already concluded
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Charter Court says it rejected protesters’ plea for further enquiry as probe already concluded
2 Oct 01:18Key points summarised by AI
Thailand's Constitutional Court rejected a request from anti-establishment leaders for additional oral evidence, citing the completion of its year-long investigation under an inquisitorial system.
The court ruled 8:1 that speeches made by Anon Nampa, Panupong Jadnok, and Panusaya Sithijirawattanakul during an August 2020 protest constituted acts aimed at overthrowing the constitutional monarchy.
Lawyers representing the anti-establishment leaders, along with Panusaya, walked out of the courtroom in protest after their request for further inquiry was denied.
Supporters of the anti-establishment movement demonstrated against the ruling by burning an effigy and distributing leaflets outside the Constitutional Court building.
Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties
Today 16:46Key points summarised by AI
A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.