Thai female lawyers fight for right to wear trousers in court

17 Sept 01:08 Key points summarised by AI

The Human Rights Lawyers Association (HRLA) and Nitihub threaten legal action against the Thai Bar Association if their petition to change the dress code, which currently forbids female lawyers from wearing trousers in court, is not addressed.
Female lawyers have reported being admonished by judges and taunted by opposing counsel for wearing trousers, underscoring the strict enforcement of the existing dress code.
Despite previous efforts by HRLA to advocate for dress guidelines allowing trousers, the Supreme Court reiterated adherence to current rules of etiquette and dress.
HRLA and Nitihub assert that the current dress code for female lawyers is irrelevant in today's social context, advocating for internationally acceptable, polite attire as sufficient.
The campaign has gained substantial public support, collecting over 4,100 signatures on change.org to push for this dress code reform.

Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties

Today 16:46 Key points summarised by AI

A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.