Polarisation widens in pro-democracy camp following “Salim Phase 2” drama

14 Sept 09:28 Key points summarised by AI

A prominent Pheu Thai supporter labeled Move Forward Party supporters as “Salim Phase 2,” sparking a significant rift within Thailand's pro-democracy movement.
The term, explained by a Pheu Thai-linked think tank, describes individuals who previously supported coups but have since become 'woke' and now back new parties like Move Forward.
This controversial labeling ignited widespread disappointment and accusations on social media, highlighting a growing schism between Pheu Thai and Move Forward factions.
The drama stems from a recent parliamentary session where Pheu Thai MPs' absence led to a lack of quorum, disrupting Move Forward's efforts to pass an Alcoholic Beverage Control measure.
Conflicting justifications emerged, with Pheu Thai claiming their absence was a tactic to pressure for parliament dissolution, while Move Forward accused them of neglecting their legislative duties.

Speculation growing over merger between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham parties

Yesterday 16:46 Key points summarised by AI

A dinner between Bhumjaithai and Kla Tham party leaders sparked rumors of a potential merger, though Bhumjaithai's leader, Anutin, downplayed it as a casual meal.
The meeting is widely interpreted as a strategic message from Bhumjaithai to the Pheu Thai party, signaling alternative support ahead of an upcoming no-confidence debate.
Thailand's Constitution (Section 99) currently prohibits direct mergers of parties with sitting MPs during the House's term, a rule designed to prevent the 'buying and selling' of MPs.
While direct mergers are restricted, MPs can still switch parties if dismissed by a three-fourths party vote or if their party dissolves, allowing for indirect political realignments.
Kla Tham's voting behavior in the censure debate will demonstrate its loyalty to the government, potentially influencing future political dynamics despite current merger restrictions.