Historically Ineffective: Despite numerous no-confidence votes over nine decades, no Thai Cabinet member has ever been ousted by censure, with governments consistently prevailing.
Debated Efficacy: Censure's role is contested; while proponents hail it as a "mirror" for accountability, skeptics argue it's often tedious, easily manipulated, and yields distorted political images.
Political Maneuvering Dominates: Outcomes frequently hinge on individual MPs' influence and political bargaining, often overshadowing the evidence of alleged wrongdoings presented during debates.
Outcome-Dependent Perception: The "beauty" or "travesty" of censure is determined by its immediate result, particularly in high-stakes situations like Prime Minister Prayut's ongoing challenges, rather than its inherent fairness or effectiveness.
Thailand's Education Ministry is implementing a four-pronged strategy to address its students' below-average performance in PISA 2025 and tackle significant educational inequality.
The plan prioritizes closing performance gaps by increasing funding for small and low-income schools, overhauling the curriculum to foster critical thinking, and adopting a data-driven management system to reduce teacher workload.
Key initiatives include enhancing school safety, combating cyberbullying, and expanding mental health support through peer-to-peer networks, recognizing the severe impact of distress on academic performance.
An education expert advises verifying if PISA improvements stem from structural changes, advocating for a revived STEM curriculum with practical 'learn by doing' methods, and urging bureaucratic reform to link teacher evaluations to student development.