Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Gen Anupong Paochinda: From coup-maker to interior minister facing ‘party putsch’
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Gen Anupong Paochinda: From coup-maker to interior minister facing ‘party putsch’
13 Sept 23:07Key points summarised by AI
Interior Minister Anupong Paochinda received the highest no-confidence vote among targeted Cabinet members, including significant dissent from his own ruling Palang Pracharath Party.
MPs expressed deep frustration over Anupong's perceived 'lack of cooperation' and refusal to endorse provincial development projects, leading to calls for his replacement by party leader Prawit Wongsuwan.
The growing dissatisfaction, dubbed a 'party putsch,' stems from politicians' desire for greater influence over the Interior Ministry's budget and provincial oversight, crucial for political advantage.
Anupong, a former Army chief and key figure in the 2014 coup alongside PM Prayut Chan-o-cha and Prawit Wongsuwan (the '3P brothers'), is Thailand's second-longest serving Interior Minister.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.