Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Law lecturers advise Constitutional Court judges PM’s term expires by Aug 24
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Law lecturers advise Constitutional Court judges PM’s term expires by Aug 24
14 Sept 10:13Key points summarised by AI
A group of 51 law lecturers from 15 universities insists Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha's 8-year term in office concludes on August 24th.
They cite Article 158 (paragraph 4) of the 2017 Constitution, which explicitly limits a prime minister's total tenure to eight years.
The lecturers argue the 2017 Constitution's term limit should apply retroactively from his August 24th, 2014 swearing-in, noting no exemption in transitory provisions.
This position underscores the principle of preventing a prime minister from monopolizing political power for an extended period.
Opposition parties plan to petition the House Speaker to seek a Constitutional Court ruling on the prime minister's term as the deadline approaches.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.