Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Election Commission urged to investigate United Thai Nation Party
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Election Commission urged to investigate United Thai Nation Party
15 Sept 08:33Key points summarised by AI
Former election commissioner Somchai Srisutthiyakorn and activist Veera Somkwamkid formally urged the Election Commission (EC) to investigate the United Thai Nation Party.
The complaint alleges election law violations during Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha's party membership event on January 9th.
Specific allegations include providing free bus transport, distributing over 4,000 sets of party merchandise (T-shirts, hats, flags) valued over a million baht, and hiring a band for entertainment.
Petitioners also requested an inquiry into a speech by Dr. Trairong Suwankiri, which allegedly referenced the Monarchy, and clarification on whether the event was a party meeting or campaigning.
The EC faces a one-month deadline to rule on the complaint, with petitioners threatening a lawsuit for alleged malfeasance if no action is taken.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.