Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yongyuth Wichaidit: Former Pheu Thai leader out of prison but back in the spotlight
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Yongyuth Wichaidit: Former Pheu Thai leader out of prison but back in the spotlight
14 Sept 02:40Key points summarised by AI
Former Pheu Thai leader Yongyuth Wichaidit recently re-entered the media spotlight due to a sex scandal allegation by lawyer Sittra Biabungkerd, which Yongyuth flatly denies.
Yongyuth previously served a two-year prison sentence for malfeasance in the 'Alpine scandal,' where he illegally approved the sale of monastic land during his time as acting permanent secretary of the Interior Ministry.
His career progressed from a civil servant to a prominent politician, holding positions such as Pheu Thai Party leader, deputy prime minister, and interior minister under the Yingluck Shinawatra government.
He resigned from his ministerial and party leadership roles in 2012 following the indictment for the Alpine scandal, which eventually led to his imprisonment in 2017 and release in 2020.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.