Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Online calls for EC’s ouster following alleged errors during advance voting
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Online calls for EC’s ouster following alleged errors during advance voting
13 Sept 12:17Key points summarised by AI
Over one million people signed an online petition demanding the ouster of Thailand's Election Commission (EC) following numerous alleged errors during advance voting.
Reported issues include incorrect zip codes on ballot envelopes, officials allegedly providing free transport for elderly voters, and an official marking a ballot for a blind voter.
The EC acknowledged 592 complaints, primarily from Bangkok, and stated that investigations are underway to substantiate the claims.
Public outrage is evident on social media, with trending hashtags questioning the EC's effectiveness and calling for the imprisonment of its commissioners.
A whistleblower further exposed an incident in Ubon Ratchathani where ballot sheets for multiple constituencies were reportedly mixed in a single ballot box.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.