Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Move Forward and Pheu Thai tussle over House speakership
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Move Forward and Pheu Thai tussle over House speakership
17 Sept 08:09Key points summarised by AI
**Coalition Clash**: Move Forward (MF) and Pheu Thai (PT), key partners in the new government coalition, are engaged in a public dispute over which party will secure the influential House speakership.
**Pheu Thai's Demand**: PT argues that since MF's leader, Pita Limjaroenrat, is set to become Prime Minister, MF should not also claim the legislative leadership, emphasizing PT's crucial support in forming the government.
**Move Forward's Justification**: MF asserts its right to the speakership, viewing it as essential for advancing its legislative agenda, particularly controversial amendments to the lèse majesté law.
**Strategic Implications**: The speakership is deemed pivotal for controlling the parliamentary process, with MF's lèse majesté law amendment policy potentially complicating Pita's prime ministerial confirmation among senators.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.