Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Move Forward-led govt’s policy on legalized cannabis – it’s complicated
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Move Forward-led govt’s policy on legalized cannabis – it’s complicated
13 Sept 07:57Key points summarised by AI
The new Move Forward-led government plans to relist marijuana as a narcotic, aiming to strictly control its use and reverse the previous administration's full legalization.
This policy shift is projected to eliminate about 70% of existing cannabis businesses, though temporary protections and new regulations will be issued for remaining legitimate operations.
While not entirely ruling out recreational use, the party intends to address the public health and safety concerns arising from decriminalization, seeking cooperation from all sides.
Pro-cannabis advocates emphasize the economic benefits for tourism and essential medical uses, urging the government to consider a progressive marijuana bill rather than a complete rollback.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.