Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Move Forward party defends its proposal to amend lèse majesté law
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Move Forward party defends its proposal to amend lèse majesté law
1 Oct 20:20Key points summarised by AI
The Move Forward Party (MFP) staunchly defends its proposal to amend Thailand's lèse majesté law (Section 112), citing its widespread abuse with 252 individuals charged since 2000 for expressing opinions.
MFP Secretary-General Chaithawat Tulathon warns the current law is a 'ticking time bomb' that must be addressed, emphasizing the party's moral obligation to rectify its inherent problems.
The proposed amendments aim to significantly reduce maximum prison sentences for defaming the King from 15 years to one year and introduce exemptions for expressions proven to be in good faith, aligning with international freedom of expression standards.
Chaithawat clarifies that the bill is not unprecedented, referencing a similar 1935 law, and assures that the King's revered constitutional status (Section 6) will remain unchanged.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.