Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Move Forward to seek revocation of Senate’s power to vote for PM
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Move Forward to seek revocation of Senate’s power to vote for PM
13 Sept 15:15Key points summarised by AI
Move Forward Party (MFP) MPs will propose a motion to parliament to revoke Article 272, which grants senators the power to vote for the Prime Minister.
This action is driven by the belief that senators opposing MFP leader Pita Limjaroenrat's candidacy will not alter their votes, regardless of how many times parliament attempts to select a PM.
A key member of the Progressive Movement suggests MFP consider an opposition role if the amendment fails, expressing skepticism about other parties joining the alliance or senators supporting a Pheu Thai candidate if MFP remains involved.
The proposed constitutional amendment aims to respect the will of the 27 million voters and explore alternative strategies beyond continuously renominating Pita.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.