Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Move Forward lobbying intensely for votes to support Pita's renomination
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Move Forward lobbying intensely for votes to support Pita's renomination
20 Sept 00:42Key points summarised by AI
Move Forward Party intensifies lobbying efforts for Pita Limjaroenrat's re-nomination as Prime Minister, ahead of Wednesday's crucial parliamentary vote.
The party specifically engaged Chartthaipattana, offering a coalition position, despite the latter's consistent opposition to Move Forward's proposed amendment of the lèse-majesté law.
Pita and his team are personally reaching out to MPs and senators who previously opposed or abstained, employing a "friendlier and softer" strategy to garner support.
Pita's initial nomination failed due to insufficient votes, primarily stemming from his party's unwavering stance on amending the lèse-majesté law, which remains a significant hurdle for securing broader backing.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.