Why are video games so often blamed for mass shootings?
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Why are video games so often blamed for mass shootings?
10 Sept 16:18Key points summarised by AI
Video games are frequently blamed for mass shootings, often linking perpetrators' reported game addiction to violent acts, as seen in the recent Siam Paragon mall shooting.
The gaming industry and netizens strongly dispute this, arguing it's unfair to stigmatize all players and the industry, as game addiction doesn't inherently lead to violent crime.
Experts emphasize that game addiction is merely one aspect; comprehensive factors like mental health, upbringing, and environment are crucial, noting insufficient evidence that games directly *trigger* mass shootings.
Concerns exist regarding underage access to age-restricted violent games due to lax enforcement of existing rating systems, highlighting the need for individual maturity and parental guidance.
Effective prevention involves parental and teacher guidance on media literacy, time management, and seeking mental health support, rather than solely blaming games, which can also offer developmental benefits.
Thailand's Education Ministry is implementing a four-pronged strategy to address its students' below-average performance in PISA 2025 and tackle significant educational inequality.
The plan prioritizes closing performance gaps by increasing funding for small and low-income schools, overhauling the curriculum to foster critical thinking, and adopting a data-driven management system to reduce teacher workload.
Key initiatives include enhancing school safety, combating cyberbullying, and expanding mental health support through peer-to-peer networks, recognizing the severe impact of distress on academic performance.
An education expert advises verifying if PISA improvements stem from structural changes, advocating for a revived STEM curriculum with practical 'learn by doing' methods, and urging bureaucratic reform to link teacher evaluations to student development.