Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Loan bill to fund “digital wallet” appropriate and transparent - Julapun
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Loan bill to fund “digital wallet” appropriate and transparent - Julapun
13 Sept 07:57Key points summarised by AI
Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat affirmed that issuing a loan bill for the digital wallet scheme is the most transparent approach, enabling parliamentary debate and oversight.
His statement directly addressed criticism from opposition MPs during a budget debate regarding the scheme's exclusion from the main budget bill.
Julapun assured that the 500 billion baht borrowing is within financial disciplinary frameworks, projecting a manageable increase in Thailand's public debt from 62% to 64% of GDP.
He clarified that budget adjustments are normal practice, refuting claims that the budget doesn't reflect a crisis and explaining that funds are allocated for both new policies and inherited, legally binding projects.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.