Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Court orders EC to remove three Senate selection regulations
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Court orders EC to remove three Senate selection regulations
23 Sept 02:18Key points summarised by AI
The Central Administrative Court mandated the Election Commission (EC) to withdraw three specific regulations (7, 8, and 11(2)) that restricted how senatorial candidates could introduce themselves.
Regulations 7 and 8 had previously limited candidates to a two-page A4 self-introduction document (prohibiting distribution at polling stations) and restricted electronic dissemination to other candidates only.
Regulation 11(2) had barred media professionals, entertainers, and MCs from using their professions for self-publicity during the election period, a restriction now lifted.
The EC Secretary General stated the office would comply with court orders deemed beneficial to the public, with the Commission to ultimately decide on a potential appeal based on public interest.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.