Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Benefits paid in cash and legalisation of underground economy popular - poll
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Benefits paid in cash and legalisation of underground economy popular - poll
15 Sept 03:07Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates strong public approval for former Prime Minister Thaksin's proposals, including paying state benefits in cash through the 'digital wallet' scheme and nationalizing electric train concessions to reduce fares.
The survey also reveals broad agreement among Thai respondents for formalizing the grey economy, suggesting a desire for economic integration and regulation.
Conversely, the public largely opposes Thaksin's ideas for developing an entertainment complex and extending land leases for foreigners to 99 years, highlighting significant areas of public disagreement.
Conducted among 1,310 Thai citizens, the poll offers insights into public sentiment regarding key economic and social policy visions, distinguishing between popular and unpopular proposals.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.