Eating to Save the Planet: Why the Thai food industry is embracing sustainability
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Eating to Save the Planet: Why the Thai food industry is embracing sustainability
11 Sept 05:57Key points summarised by AI
The Thai food industry is actively redefining eating as a powerful tool for positive environmental change, moving beyond its traditional perception as a planetary destroyer.
Driven by heightened post-pandemic health consciousness, consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable and organic food, prompting chefs and entrepreneurs to adopt eco-friendly practices.
Pioneering initiatives, such as Jampa restaurant's zero-waste policy and organic garden, and Sampran Garden's 'Happy Market,' successfully connect organic farmers directly with consumers, ensuring fair prices and fresh produce.
Advocates emphasize that embracing local and organic farming significantly reduces carbon emissions, supports local economies, and provides healthier food options.
The movement seeks broader consumer engagement and industry collaboration, with recognition like the Michelin Green Star further accelerating the shift towards a sustainable food future.
Thailand's Education Ministry is implementing a four-pronged strategy to address its students' below-average performance in PISA 2025 and tackle significant educational inequality.
The plan prioritizes closing performance gaps by increasing funding for small and low-income schools, overhauling the curriculum to foster critical thinking, and adopting a data-driven management system to reduce teacher workload.
Key initiatives include enhancing school safety, combating cyberbullying, and expanding mental health support through peer-to-peer networks, recognizing the severe impact of distress on academic performance.
An education expert advises verifying if PISA improvements stem from structural changes, advocating for a revived STEM curriculum with practical 'learn by doing' methods, and urging bureaucratic reform to link teacher evaluations to student development.