Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Panel report on drafting amnesty bill for political offenders rejected by House
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Panel report on drafting amnesty bill for political offenders rejected by House
11 Sept 07:12Key points summarised by AI
Thailand's House of Representatives rejected a panel's observations on drafting an amnesty bill for political offenders, including those charged with lèse majesté, effectively halting its progress with a 270:149 vote.
The vote highlighted a significant split within the ruling Pheu Thai party and coalition, with most MPs voting against the framework, while the opposition People's Party largely supported it.
The central point of contention was the potential inclusion of lèse majesté offenders; proponents argued it's vital for reconciliation, while opponents feared it would exonerate all such individuals.
The House panel chairman confirmed the panel deliberately avoided a decision on including lèse majesté offenses due to its sensitive nature, though he suggested the report's drafting guidelines could still be useful for future proposals.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.