Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
People’s party questions why government wants control of THAI Airways
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
People’s party questions why government wants control of THAI Airways
13 Sept 14:04Key points summarised by AI
The opposition People’s Party questions the government's attempt to regain control of THAI Airways as the national carrier prepares to exit court-sanctioned rehabilitation.
The government proposes appointing two new managers to THAI's five-member planning panel, aiming to secure a majority vote on critical financial decisions.
This proposed majority would allow the government to control debt-to-equity swaps and share price reductions, potentially disadvantaging other creditors.
Concerns are raised about potential government interference in THAI's operations, recalling past financial losses from aircraft purchases, and the source of funds for new share capital.
The People's Party urges creditors to reject the proposed managers, arguing the planning panel should represent creditors' interests, not shareholders'.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.