Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Thai TV News: Adapting or Dying in the Digital Age
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Thai TV News: Adapting or Dying in the Digital Age
10 Sept 22:03Key points summarised by AI
The traditional model of Thai TV news as a free public service is collapsing due to declining advertising revenue and the rise of digital platforms, leading to widespread layoffs and station closures.
Social media and citizen journalism have profoundly disrupted the news landscape, challenging conventional outlets that struggled to adapt, resulting in compromised journalistic quality and independence.
To survive, Thai TV news must innovate by developing proprietary applications, offering exclusive content, and prioritizing in-depth, credible investigative journalism to differentiate itself from user-generated content.
The future of Thai TV news hinges on understanding technology and personalized consumer needs, transforming news from a free service into a valuable, revenue-generating commodity.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.