Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Concerns voiced about repercussions of broadcast regulator conviction
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Concerns voiced about repercussions of broadcast regulator conviction
16 Sept 14:47Key points summarised by AI
A former broadcast regulator warns that the conviction of NBTC member Professor Pirongrong Ramasoota will significantly impede the commission's future regulatory duties.
The verdict may cause individual commissioners to become overly cautious in their statements and actions, fearing similar legal repercussions and prioritizing personal safety over diligent work.
The court's interpretation of Pirongrong's phrase "to dethrone a giant" as evidence of bias is contested, with arguments that the meeting's context and atmosphere were overlooked.
The ruling could establish a precedent, potentially encouraging other broadcasters to initiate legal actions against the NBTC and its members, further complicating regulatory oversight.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.