Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Bhumjaithai walks out of charter amendment debate in parliament
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Bhumjaithai walks out of charter amendment debate in parliament
13 Sept 13:21Key points summarised by AI
The Bhumjaithai party walked out of parliament, refusing to participate in the debate on proposed charter amendments by the Pheu Thai and People's parties.
The party's Secretary-General cited a 2021 Constitutional Court ruling, stating that a public referendum must be held first to gauge opinion on amending the existing charter.
Bhumjaithai leader Anutin Charnvirakul clarified that their position adheres to court rulings, not an attempt to obstruct Pheu Thai, emphasizing the bill is not a government-wide resolution.
Following the walkout, a group of senators submitted an urgent motion to Parliament President, seeking a Constitutional Court ruling on whether a referendum is required before the amendment debate, likely causing a snag in the scheduled proceedings.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.