Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Opposition to casino project gaining strength
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Opposition to casino project gaining strength
13 Sept 10:31Key points summarised by AI
Opposition to the government's casino project is escalating, with the Buddhist Association of Thailand and former constitution drafters joining forces against the entertainment complex bill.
Critics, including former Constitutional Court judge Jarun Pakdeethanakul, argue the bill will not solve economic problems or benefit the people, but rather foreign investors, while enabling access for Thais and legalizing online gambling, potentially leading to youth addiction and increased crime.
Concerns are raised that the project was not in the government's original policy statement, was introduced by former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, and contradicts the 20-year national strategic vision.
The Buddhist Association vehemently opposes the project, asserting it would transform Thailand into a 'land of vice' instead of a 'land of Dharma,' threatening the nation's moral fabric and the future of its children.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.