Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Medical council denies minister’s bid for review members’ names
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Medical council denies minister’s bid for review members’ names
14 Sept 18:00Key points summarised by AI
The Medical Council of Thailand rejected Public Health Minister Somsak Thepsuthin's demand for the names and meeting records of a screening subcommittee.
Somsak sought this information due to a discrepancy in recommended penalties for three doctors who treated former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, as the screening panel proposed harsher sanctions than the initial investigatory panel.
The Council declined the request, citing the need to safeguard the independence of the screening panel members, which includes external experts, and the unprecedented nature of such a demand from a special chairman.
Instead of the specific documentation, the Medical Council furnished Somsak with a comprehensive 95-page report detailing the entire investigation.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.