Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
NIDA Poll: Prayut tops list of preferred successors if Paetongtarn quits
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
NIDA Poll: Prayut tops list of preferred successors if Paetongtarn quits
15 Sept 23:57Key points summarised by AI
A NIDA poll indicates 42.37% of respondents believe suspended PM Paetongtarn Shinawatra should resign, with Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha topping the list of preferred successors at 32.82%.
The same poll reveals strong public support (64.43%) for political parties to initiate a no-confidence motion against the prime minister and/or cabinet ministers.
Separately, a Suan Dusit Poll highlights that the public's top priority for the new Cabinet is urgently addressing the rising cost of living and economic problems (65.41%).
Public skepticism persists regarding the qualifications and integrity of new Cabinet members (62.97%), alongside significant worry about the economic impact of potential US tariffs under a Trump administration.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.