Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
EC asked to take legal action against 138 senators over alleged election collusion
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
EC asked to take legal action against 138 senators over alleged election collusion
13 Sept 05:52Key points summarised by AI
A joint investigative panel recommends the Election Commission (EC) pursue legal action against 138 senators and 91 individuals, including Bhumjaithai party executives, for alleged collusion in last year's Senate election.
Allegations detail Bhumjaithai-affiliated candidates orchestrating collusion across multiple provinces, with over half of the 200 senators reportedly linked to the party.
Should the EC concur, the case may proceed to the Constitutional Court, potentially resulting in the dissolution of the Bhumjaithai party.
The Department of Special Investigation's (DSI) involvement in the probe, despite objections, is widely perceived as a political maneuver by the Pheu Thai party against Bhumjaithai.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.