Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Charter Court to rule on Paetongtarn’s leaked Hun Sen call on August 29
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Charter Court to rule on Paetongtarn’s leaked Hun Sen call on August 29
13 Sept 14:46Key points summarised by AI
The Constitutional Court will deliver its ruling on August 29 regarding suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's case concerning her leaked phone conversation with Cambodia's Hun Sen.
Thirty-six senators petitioned the court, accusing Paetongtarn of gross ethical misconduct and dishonesty for her comments during the call, leading to her suspension from prime-ministerial duties.
In the leaked recording, Paetongtarn allegedly referred to a Thai Second Army Region commander as "the opposition" and expressed willingness to fulfill Hun Sen's requests, which petitioners claim demonstrates a lack of integrity and prioritization of personal ties.
Paetongtarn admitted the voice was hers, defending the conversation as a private negotiation intended to maintain peace and Thailand's sovereignty.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.