Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Myanmar displaced persons in border camps permitted to work amid labour shortages
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Myanmar displaced persons in border camps permitted to work amid labour shortages
13 Sept 13:02Key points summarised by AI
The Thai Cabinet has approved a proposal to allow approximately 42,000 Myanmar displaced persons residing in nine border camps to legally work in Thailand for one year, aiming to alleviate current labour shortages.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) welcomed this policy change as a significant step, fostering economic growth for the displaced population, local communities, and Thailand.
Displaced individuals are now permitted to work in any province in jobs not exclusively reserved for Thai nationals, with the government waiving work permit fees to ease their financial burden.
While the move addresses critical labour needs in sectors like industry, construction, and agriculture, concerns were raised regarding the brokerage system, advocating for displaced persons to have more choice in selecting jobs and employers.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.