Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
People’s party submits constitutional amendments draft bill to the House
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
People’s party submits constitutional amendments draft bill to the House
10 Sept 12:34Key points summarised by AI
The opposition People’s party submitted a draft bill to amend Chapter 15 of the Constitution, proposing a 35-member committee to craft a new national charter.
This move initiates the first of three referenda, seeking public consent on the new charter's creation and acceptance, potentially aligning with a general election post-House dissolution.
To comply with a Constitutional Court ruling, the party revised its plan, now offering two options for the charter writing panel: a 35-member committee shortlisted by parliament from elected candidates, or a 100-member advisory committee feeding into a 100-member drafting committee.
The proposed charter writing panel would have 270 days to complete the new charter, which would then be presented to parliament and subject to a final public referendum.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.