Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Senator Nantana stands firm after Senate ethics breach verdict
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Senator Nantana stands firm after Senate ethics breach verdict
10 Sept 17:00Key points summarised by AI
Senator Nantana was found guilty by a 130:26 Senate vote of a gross ethical violation for allegedly describing a fellow senator as a “pork vendor,” a decision she vehemently condemned as “shameful” and “bullying.”
Nantana questioned the Senate's haste to rule before a court verdict and claimed she was denied a chance to defend herself, asserting her comment was about occupational diversity, not an insult.
Despite the resolution, Nantana vowed to fight on and continue her duties, asking the public to judge if the remark truly constituted a gross ethical violation.
Other senators, Wuttipong Pongsuwan and Pattharapong Supaksorn, expressed sympathy for Nantana, criticizing the Senate's decision and the perceived lack of due process.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.