Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
EC urges clean voting as survey shows high public concern
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
EC urges clean voting as survey shows high public concern
16 Sept 06:25Key points summarised by AI
The Election Commission (EC) mandates officials nationwide to prioritize promoting clean and honest voting, combating vote-buying amid rising public criticism ahead of the February 8 general election.
A nationwide survey indicates that 42% of respondents anticipate widespread vote-buying, with estimated payments potentially reaching up to 7,500 baht per person in certain areas.
While a majority (71.9%) reject voting for candidates offering money and 69% would refuse it, 18% admitted they would accept payments, and 28.1% might still vote for such candidates due to various factors.
The survey also highlights public concern that corruption in Thailand is intensifying, negatively impacting citizens, businesses, the economy, and the country's international reputation, citing questionable politicians and conflicts of interest.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.