Election fraud must be proved, not recounted - Kaewsan

13 Sept 09:45 Key points summarised by AI

Former law professor Kaewsan Atibodhi asserts that challenging election results legally requires proving fraud, not demanding recounts after the vote count is completed and endorsed, deeming such post-count demands without immediate objection as "provocation."
Kaewsan clarifies that while immediate objections during a count are valid, subsequent disagreements must be based on evidence of unfairness or rigging, potentially leading to rechecks of sealed ballots or fresh elections, stressing the legal distinction between recounts and objections.
In contrast, the 'Three-Finger' movement (UFTD) rallies, demanding open recounts across all 400 constituencies and the resignation of all election commissioners, citing doubts about the Election Commission's process and transparency.

Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings

Yesterday 15:20 Key points summarised by AI

Thailand's Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul initiated a nationwide crackdown on illegal Thai nominee shareholders in foreign-run businesses and land holdings to safeguard national interests.
The government will integrate efforts across all relevant agencies to target illicit foreign operations, forced sales of illegally acquired property, and high-risk land ownership schemes.
Key strategies include auditing suspect land and building holdings, establishing a long-term monitoring system, and cross-referencing data from various authorities to trace ultimate beneficial owners.
Prime Minister Anutin emphasized that no influential figures or corrupt officials are above the law, promising straightforward prosecution, asset seizures, and protection for enforcing officers.
Beyond land ownership, the integrated crackdown will also extend to tackle transnational crimes, including drug and human trafficking.