Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Chaiwat Sathawornwichit: People’s Party candidate seeks knockout blow in Bangkok election
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
Chaiwat Sathawornwichit: People’s Party candidate seeks knockout blow in Bangkok election
14 Sept 10:03Key points summarised by AI
Chaiwat Sathawornwichit, the People’s Party (PP) candidate, is challenging incumbent Bangkok Governor Chadchart Sittipunt, backed by his party's massive popularity in the capital.
Despite the PP's momentum from recent national election successes, Chaiwat faces an "uphill battle" against Chadchart, who is the strong favorite in polls and is expected to seek a second term.
Chaiwat, a former central bank executive, stepped in as the candidate after the initial choice, Wiroj, was sidelined by legal issues, and he aims to offer a compelling alternative for Bangkok's future.
Chadchart, who achieved a historic landslide victory in 2022, acknowledges the upcoming contest will be intense, recognizing the shifting political landscape and the PP's robust support in the city.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.