Nationwide crackdown launched on illegal nominee shareholders and land holdings
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
New Thai court directive aims to curb abuse of SLAPP suits
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
New Thai court directive aims to curb abuse of SLAPP suits
11 Sept 02:59Key points summarised by AI
Thai Supreme Court President Adisak Tantiwong issued a directive providing judges with guidelines to handle Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) cases.
The directive empowers judges to examine suspected SLAPP cases, ensuring legal rights are not used to persecute, restrict free expression, or intimidate defendants acting in the public interest.
It aims to protect individuals who honestly express views on public interests, environmental issues, consumer rights, or expose corruption from being burdened by legal actions.
Courts can now dismiss identified SLAPP cases during the pre-trial process or request additional evidence, enhancing judicial efficiency and transparency in addressing this prevalent issue in Thailand.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
18 Oct 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.