Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
House votes down Opposition proposal for panel to study land bridge project
AI In-Brief
Thailand News in Brief
Thai PBS World
Thailand and the world, every day
AI can make mistakes. Please double-check.
House votes down Opposition proposal for panel to study land bridge project
10 Sept 17:00Key points summarised by AI
The House of Representatives rejected an Opposition motion to establish a panel for a comprehensive feasibility study of the government’s 1-trillion baht land bridge project, with a vote of 266:174.
Opposition MPs intensely debated the project, raising concerns about its economic viability, environmental impact, transparency, and potential effects on local rights and national security.
Democrat Party Leader Abhisit Vejjajiva criticized the project's omission from government election policies and suggested it might serve vested interests, potentially escalating geo-political tensions.
People’s Party Leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut proposed an alternative, the Southern Biodiversity Regeneration Corridor (SBRC), advocating for a sustainable development strategy for the southern region.
Public expects most Kla Tham MPs to back Cabinet in censure vote, NIDA Poll finds
Yesterday 12:30Key points summarised by AI
A recent NIDA poll indicates that a plurality of the public (30.38%) anticipates Kla Tham Party MPs will vote to support all 18 cabinet ministers targeted in the upcoming no-confidence debate.
Respondents believe the Ministry of Interior (38.78%) and the Prime Minister’s Office (21.37%) will face the toughest questioning during the censure debate.
Economic issues, particularly alleged incompetence in addressing problems (34.27%) and the rising cost of living (25.88%), are cited as the primary concerns for the government during the censure.
The public holds high expectations for the Opposition's case, with 45.65% believing clear, concrete evidence will be presented against all 18 ministers, and 41.22% expecting substantial evidence against specific ministers.